ARTHROPOD BIOLOGY Biology of Dineulophus phtorimaeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and Field Interaction With Pseudapanteles dignus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Larval Parasitoids of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Tomato MARÍA G. LUNA,1 VERÓNICA I. WADA, AND NORMA E. SÁNCHEZ CEPAVE (CCT-La PlataÐCONICETÐUNLP), Calle 2 Nro. 584 (1900) La Plata, Argentina Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 103(6): 936Ð942 (2010); DOI: 10.1603/AN10021 ABSTRACT Some biological characteristics of the ectoparasitoid Dineulophus phtorimaeae (de Santis) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and Þeld interaction with the endoparasitoid Pseudapanteles dignus (Muesebeck), both larval parasitoids of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), were examined. In addition, we completed the original description of D. phtorimaeae. Preimaginal developmental time of the ectoparasitoid was 11.17 � 0.60 d for both sexes, and adult life span was 11.73 � 0.92 d for females and 8.78 � 0.93 d for males. The proportion of males to females was equal. In the Þeld, hosts were parasitized at the third larval instar. On average, a female attacked ca. four hosts throughout her lifetime and deposited eggs in �50% of cases. The most successful female attacked six hosts, yielding a potential fecundity of �10 eggs. Host paralysis without parasitism was observed, suggesting stinging for host feeding. The daily oviposition curve is compatible with a synovigenic-type parasitoid. Our prediction stating thatD. phtorimaeaewould succeed when competing for hosts with P. dignus was correct, because the former species had greater parasitism rates. In the Þeld, both T. absoluta parasitoids were able to coexist at leaf scale. The negative aspects of differences in feeding behavior, narrower host range (third instar), and lower fecundity of D. phtorimaeae would be compensated by its better attributes as natural enemy, in comparison with P. dignus, enabling coexistence. KEY WORDS Dineulophus phtorimaeae, Pseudapanteles dignus, parasitoid, coexistence, Tuta abso- luta Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is a major pest of greenhouse and open-Þeld tomato, Solanum lycopersicum L., crops in South America (Fernández and Montagne 1990; Botto 1999; Ecole et al. 2000; Siqueira et al. 2000, and references therein). It has recently been introduced to Europe (Urbaneja et al. 2009, Netherlands Plant Protection Service 2009, Speranza et al. 2009). Larvae cause plant damage by mining leaves and fruit; therefore, the use of chemical pesticides is a widespread practice to control this pest. Considering the adverse effects of pesticides to human health and environment quality, it is important that alternative methods, such as biological control, are developed for incorporation into a tomato integrated pest management (IPM) program (Lewis et al. 1997, Sánchez et al. 2009). Successful biological control programs in horticul- tural crops have been obtained by seasonal augmen- tative releases of parasitoids (Bale et al. 2008). In Argentina, T. absoluta has two main native larval para- sitoids in tomato crops. They belong to different para- sitoid guilds: the endoparasitoid Pseudapanteles dignus (Muesebeck) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), which is currently under study as a moth control agent (Luna et al. 2007, Sánchez et al. 2009); and the ectoparasitoid Dineulophus phtorimaeae (de Santis) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) (de Santis 1983, Colomo et al. 2002). P. dignus shows some positive biological traits that make it a promising candidate for conservation biological control, seasonal augmentative releases, or both (Luna et al. 2007, Sánchez et al. 2009).D. phtorimaeae is less well known, with only partial morphological description (de Santis 1983) and historical reports of its presence in tomato crops from Argentina and Chile (Vargas 1970, Larraṍn 1986, Colomo et al. 2002). Parasitoids are classiÞed as koinobionts or idio- bionts (Haeselbarth 1979, Askew and Shaw 1986). Koinobionts allow the host to develop beyond the stage attacked, whereas idiobionts permanently par- alyze or kill the host in the stage attacked. In addition, idiobionts are relatively more generalist (i.e., have broader speciÞc host range), have larger eggs, faster larval development, and longer adult life span, and they live in more protected sites (the majority attack1 Corresponding author, e-mail: lunam@cepave.edu.ar. 0013-8746/10/0936Ð0942$04.00/0 � 2010 Entomological Society of America concealed hosts) than koinobionts. Furthermore, they do not elicit physiological defense mechanisms of the host, e.g., encapsulation. The majority of successful cultures, including in vitro rearings, have involved idiobionts, and, in particular, ectoparasitoids (Quicke 1997). Multiparasitism, i.e., the use of a single host indi- vidual by two or more parasitoid species, is very common in nature (Lane et al. 2006). As a result, parasitoids can experience intra- and interspeciÞc competition. Categorization of parasitoids in koino- and idiobionts is a practical indication useful to ana- lyze their potential as a biological control agent as well as their ability to compete within a particular parasi- toid assemblage (Mills 2006). Life history traits such as host immobilization, shorter developmental times, and higher searching abilities allow predicting that ectoparasitoid idiobionts are competitively superior to koinobionts (Hawkins 2000, Strand 2000). The study of potential coexistence of two parasitoid species on the same host and their impact on to top-down limi- tation of a pest population is a relevant topic in bio- logical control. The goals of this research were two-fold: 1) to study some general biological aspects ofD. phtorimaeae and 2) to assess its interaction with P. dignus in tomato Þelds. Based on the hypothesis that the idiobiont D. phtorimaeae would be a better competitor than the koinobiont P. dignus,we predicted that in the ÞeldD. phtorimaeae would produce higher parasitism rates than the endoparasitoid P. dignus. Materials and Methods Biology of D. phtorimaeae. Field collections of to- mato leaves with T. absoluta damage were made in commercial crops located in the vicinity of La Plata, a major horticultural region of Buenos Aires province, Argentina (34� 58� S, 57� 59� W) (Sánchez et al. 2009). Host stage attacked, preimaginal developmental time of the parasitoid, and sex ratio were determined and recorded. Mines were dissected under a stereomicroscope to search for presence of miners and parasitoids and to observe the instar attacked. All hosts with the pres- ence ofD.phtorimaeae larvae were individually reared in 5-ml glass vials. To allow proper pupal formation and prevent degradation of plant material, vials were provided with one by 0.5-cm Þlter paper card wetted with distilled water and kept sealed. They were checked daily to correct water saturation or dryness inside. Sexes were identiÞed at pupal stage based on dimorphic differences, such as shorter body length and a translucent area on the gaster in males, visible �24 h before adult emergence (de Santis 1983). In- sects were kept in a walk-in-chamber at 25 � 3�C, 70 � 10% RH, and a photoperiod of 14:10 (L:D) h. The specimens obtained through these collections wereobservedundera stereomicroscope(modelSMZ 800, Nikon, Melville, NY) to describe pupal and imag- inalmorphology.Tenwaspsofeach sexweredissected in distilled water and transferred into glycerin to mea- sure pupal and adult body sizes (length). Means and SEs were calculated as descriptive statistics. In addi- tion, illustrations of adults of both sexes were made, because only partial visual descriptions made by de Santis (1983) were available thus far. The parasitoid preimaginal developmental time for both sexes was calculated as the mean number of days from larvae at early instars (L1 to L2) to adult emergence. The sex ratio was calculated as the total number of males/ (number of males � number of females). For the adult stage, the following biological char- acteristics were recorded in the laboratory: longevity (both sexes), oviposition behavior (host feeding and egg laying), daily oviposition rate, total fecundity, and mean brood size. Newly emerged adults were paired and placed in 5-ml glass vials containing a 1- by 0.5-cm Þlter paper card with honey solution (50%). Couples were allowed to mate for 24 h, and then mated females were relocated to 60-ml vials and provided with Þve third-instar host larvae from a laboratory colony (see below). Vials were monitored daily and batches of Þve hosts were replaced when signs of parasitoid attack were detected, until each female died. Males were kept apart, provided with honey solution until death. Hosts were produced by rearing aT. absolutacolony as reported previously (Luna et al. 2007). All hosts used during the experiment were already installed in mines. To determine host parasitoid attack (host paralysis or presence of D. phtorimaeae eggs or larvae) indi- viduals were checked under a stereomicroscope. All parasitized hosts were transferred to 5-ml vials until parasitoid pupa formation. Mean adult longevity of both sexes was measured as the mean number of days wasps lived, from adult emergence to death. Fecundity was measured by two means: 1) lifetime fecundity, as the mean number of eggs per female wasp; and 2) potential fecundity (as in Zaviezo and Mills 1999),bymultiplying theaveragenumberofeggs laid per host by each female by the number of hosts parasitized by the most successful female. Life history data are presented as mean � SE. Dif- ferences in preimaginal developmental time and adult longevity between sexes of D. phtorimaeae were an- alyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Before analysis, data were checked for normality and homogeneity of variances. When ANOVA assump- tions were violated, a KruskalÐWallis test was used. Differences were considered signiÞcant at P � 0.05. Analyses were performed with Statistica 7.0 (StatSoft 2007). Field Interaction With P. dignus. To assess inter- action between D. phtorimaeae and P. dignus in the Þeld, we carried out a sampling of both parasitoid species in an organic open-Þeld tomato crop in the study area. The inßuence of the spatial scale of analysis on patterns of parasitism has been widely discussed previously (Heads and Lawton 1983, Lill 1998). A previous study indicated that P. dignus concentrates on tomato crops with greater host density but displays a density-independent rate of parasitism in relation to T. absoluta larval density, at the leaf spatial scale November 2010 LUNA ET AL: BIOLOGY OF D. phtorimaeae IN TOMATO 937 (Sánchez et al. 2009). Thus, we analyzed the interac- tion between both parasitoids at that spatial scale, and established groups according to host density recorded (from one to the maximum number of larvae found) per leaf. The sampling took place in late March 2004, when host and parasitoid populations were conspicuously settled in crops. Samples consisted of the third apical part (containing approximately eight expanded leaves) of 20 plants, randomly selected. In the labo- ratory, plants were sorted in all component leaves and then viewed under a stereomicroscope to search forT. absoluta larvae and for the ectoparasitoid (egg, larva, or pupa). To Þnd the endoparasitoid, living host larvae were placed individually in petri dishes, provided with fresh tomato leaves as food, and maintained in a walk-in rearing chamber at 25 � 2�C temperature, 70% RH, and a photoperiod of 14:10 (L:D) h until P. dignus cocoon formation. Dead hosts were dissected to check whether they were parasitized by the endoparasitoid (egg and larva). The number of T. absoluta larvae and the number of ecto- and endoparasitoids per leaf were recorded. The proportions of parasitized T. absoluta for each para- sitoid species, and for both species in the same leaf, were estimated as the number of parasitized larvae/ total number of hosts collected. Proportions were av- eraged by each host density group and arcsine trans- formed for further analyses. The differences in mean proportions of parasitism (response variable) by each parasitoid species, occur- ring alone or together in the same leaf (categorical independent variable with three categories: P. dignus only,D. phtorimaeae only, or both), at each host den- sity category (continuous independent variable) could not be analyzed by a two-way ANOVA due to non-normality of data. One-way analysis of covariance for the same response variable and using the number of parasitoids found per leaf (P. dignus, D. phtori- maeae, or both) as a categorical independent variable and the host density as a covariate (more than one larva per leaf) could not be used either because the categorical variable slopes were heterogeneous (Gotelli and Ellison 2004). Thus, we evaluated the response variable for each host density group sepa- rately, using one-way ANOVA (or KruskalÐWallis when ANOVA assumptions could not be corrected with transformations). Additionally, we examined the relationship between mean total proportions of par- asitism by each single species (occurring alone or together with the other parasitoid in the same leaf) by linear regressions. The null hypothesis was that the proportion of parasitism by each species does not vary with host density. Analyses were performed with Sta- tistica 7.0 (StatSoft 2007), and a signiÞcance level of P � 0.05 was chosen for all statistical analyses. Results Biology of D. phtorimaeae. Body size (length) was 2.28 � 0.09 mm (n � 47) for the pupal stage, 1.69 � 0.14 mm (n � 10) for the adult male, and 2.17 � 0.13 mm (n � 10) for females (Fig. 1). The latter value is larger than that described previously (de Santis 1983). Sexual dimorphism was noted at pupal stage: males can be distinguished 24 h before adult emergence by the translucent area on the gaster, a characteristic de- scribed for the imago (de Santis 1983). Preimaginal developmental time was 11 d for both sexes (H � 0.31, df � 1, P � 0.57; n � 47) (Table 1). Adult longevity differed signiÞcantly between sexes, being longer for females(F�4.45;df�1, 34;P�0.04). Fig. 1. D. phtorimaeae adult female (a) and male (b). Table 1. Life history traits of D. phtorimaeae, a larval ecto- parasitoid of T. absoluta Trait Value Preimaginal developmental time (mean � SE, d) Female 11.06 � 0.38 Male 11.29 � 0.81 Total 11.17 � 0.60 Adult longevity (mean � SE, d) Female 11.73 � 0.92 Male 8.78 � 0.93 Sex ratio (no. males/no. males � no. females) � 0.51 (n � 48) Reproductive behavior (mean � SE no.) Paralyzed hosts/female (n � 13) 2.00 � 0.60 Parasitized hosts/female (n � 9) 1.61 � 0.60 Potential fecundity (eggs/female) (n � 9) 9.69 � 3.61 938 ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Vol. 103, no. 6 The proportion of sexes was equal under Þeld condi- tions (n � 48). D. phtorimaeae larval morphology was hymenop- teriform. All parasitized host larvae collected in the Þeld and brought to the laboratory were late larvae (mainly third instar), and all had only a single para- sitoid larva (n � 122). Thirteen of 24 coupled D. phtorimaeae attacked hosts, and nine of those 13 D. phtorimaeae effectively parasitized T. absoluta larvae. All of them showed symptoms of permanent paralysis and could be dis- tinguished from active larvae by their yellowish col- oration and lack of mobility. The host larvae died within 24 h after the parasitoids began to feed. Some paralyzed hosts lacked a D. phtorimaeae egg, an indi- cation of nonconcurrent host feeding. On average, a female attacked four hosts throughout her lifetime and deposited eggs in �50% of the cases. The number of hosts attacked by the most successful female was six, yielding a potential fecundity of �10 eggs (Table 1). Only one individual parasitoid per host developed effectively, although up to two D. phtorimaeae eggs were observed on some hosts. Females frequently entered the mines to attack T. absoluta larvae and failed to parasitize moth larvae outside tomato leaves. Pleiotropism of hatched larvae on paralyzed hosts was observed. The Þrst oviposition event took place 4 d after the Þrst batch of hosts was offered and the maximal daily mean of oviposition rate was 1.2 hosts, at the Þfth day of female life. The shape of the oviposition curve showed a synovigenic-type parasitoid behavior (Fig. 2). Evidence for Parasitoid Guild Interaction. In total, 160 leaves were observed, yielding 324 T. absoluta larvae in 97 leaves. In total, both parasitoid species attacked �45% ofT. absoluta larvae; 20% were affected by the ectoparasitoid and 23.34% by the endoparasi- toid. We recorded six groups of parasitized host den- sities at leaf spatial scale (1, 2, 3, 4Ð6, 7Ð10, and 12Ð16 larvae per leaf). The range of host densities agreed with those reported for organic tomato crops in the region (Sánchez et al. 2009). Differences in percentages of parasitism among cat- egories were found at a density of one host per leaf (H � 7.70, df � 1, P � 0.005; n � 64), with P. dignus parasitism higher than that ofD.phtorimaeae(Fig. 3a). We also found that parasitism due to both species in the same leaf, at a density of four to six larvae per leaf, was signiÞcantly greater than those caused by each parasitoid alone (F� 9.04, df � 2, P� 0.002) (Fig. 3d). However, at most host densities there were no differ- ences in percentages of parasitism among categories (two hosts per leaf:H� 5.65, df � 2, P� 0.06 [n� 12]; three hosts per leaf: H � 3.01, df � 2, P � 0.22 [n � 11]; and 7Ð10 hosts per leaf:H� 1.97, df � 2, P� 0.37 [n� 8]) (Fig. 3b, c, and e). It also was observed that at the host density category �10 hosts per leaf, par- asitism always involved both species (Fig. 3f). When the proportion of parasitism by each single species was discriminated in the both species in the same leaf category across the host densities (Fig. 3bÐf), we ob- served that the ectoparasitoid increased its percentage of parasitism of T. absoluta with respect to P. dignus, as the host density increased, attaining values as high as 85Ð95%. Regression analyses revealed that total mean pro- portion of parasitism by D. phtorimaeae increased signiÞcantly with host density, whereas that caused by P. dignus showed a decreasing pattern, although the slope was not signiÞcant in the latter case (Table 2). Discussion The preimaginal and imaginal morphological traits of D. phtorimaeae reported in this article expand the original descriptions made by Blanchard (1939) and de Santis (1983). D. phtorimaeae exhibits promising traits to be a successful biocontrol agent. This study provides evi- dence that it can immobilize hosts permanently, in the presence or absence of oviposition. A relatively faster preimaginal developmental time for both sexes and a slightly longer adult life span confer a moderate short- lived generation of �23 d, compared with P. dignus (�36 d; Luna et al. 2007). In the Þeld, D. phtorimaeae can be responsible for �30% parasitism of its host, as demonstrated in this study and reported previously (Larraṍn 1986, Colomo et al. 2002), and its attack rates can increase with host density increment. An extra beneÞt can be obtained by host feeding, which causes additional host mortal- ity and prevents consumption of foliage (Briggs 1993, Jervis and Kidd 1999). However, the amount of T. absolutamortality by host feeding in the Þeld was not estimated in this study. Relatively low D. phtorimaeae fecundity can be re- lated to synovigeny, a predominant egg maturation pattern among parasitoid wasps (Jervis et al. 2001), because this results in energetically expensive pro- duction of eggs with large quantities of yolk. Host feeding can provide those nutrients but is another costly and time-consuming process that can also limit the number of progeny (Rivero and West 2005). Al- though high fecundity is an expected positive life trait for an efÞcient biological control agent, there are Fig. 2. Daily number of eggs (mean � SE) oviposited over the lifetime ofD. phtorimaeae females with a T. absoluta larval density of Þve per day. November 2010 LUNA ET AL: BIOLOGY OF D. phtorimaeae IN TOMATO 939 reports of successful agents with similar oviposition rates to D. phtorimaeae, such as the bethylid Prorops nasutaWaterston (Infante et al. 2005), with 4.3 prog- eny per female; the eulophids Eulophus pennicornis (Nees), Hyssopus pallidus (Askew), and Euplectrus maternus Bhatnagar, with 1.5 and 14 hosts per female and 22.2 eggs per female, respectively (Marris and Edwards 1995, Zaviezo and Mills 1999, Muniappan et al. 2004); and for the ichneumonidMastrus ridibundus Gravenhorst, with 0.4Ð0.9 hosts per day (Bezemer and Mills 2001). Our prediction stating that D. phtorimaeae would succeed when competing for hosts with P. dignuswas correct; indeed, we registered higher D. phtorimaeae parasitism. Both parasitoids can coexist at the host densities recorded in the Þeld and also produce higher parasitism rates than those reported forP.dignuswhen it occurred alone (Sánchez et al. 2009). Modeling results of host-parasitoid interactions (Lane et al. 2006) indicated that a limited fecundity of one species does not inevitably reduce the potential for coexistence, provided one is more efÞcient and the other more fecund. Also, different host density levels and host niche differentiation contribute to multiple parasitoid species coexistence (Briggs 1993, Mills 2006). All these factors seem to occur in the P. dig- nusÐD. phtorimaeaeÐT. absoluta system. InterspeciÞc competition in primary parasitoids has been explained by competitive exclusion and coexist- ence (Briggs 1993, Ueno 1999, Collier and Hunter 2001, Collier et al. 2007, Mills 2006). Mechanisms in- volved in competitive interaction of dual parasitoid species at immature stages are as follows: 1) interfer- ence, with both larvae in the same host, including multiparasitism and intraguild predation via killing competitors, ovicide, and host feeding; and 2) exploi- tation, when earlier-attacking parasitoids reduce host density for the second species. There is also the po- tential for adult competition via mutual interference by females searching for hosts and mechanisms deal- Fig. 3. Mean (�SE) proportions of Þeld-parasitized T. absoluta larvae by two parasitoid species at six different host densities (La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina). Pd, P. dignus alone in a leaf; Dp, D. phtorimaeae alone in a leaf; and Both, two species in the same leaf. SigniÞcant differences are given by different letters. Parasitism ratios of P. dignus versus D. phtorimaeae are indicated in the box. Table 2. Regression analyses of total proportion of T. absoluta parasitized by P. dignus and D. phtorimaeae, occurring alone or both in the same leaf, on six host densities per leaf (1, 2, 3, 4–6, 7–10, and 12–16) Species Slope � SE R2 F df P D. phtorimaeae 0.32 � 0.10 0.10 10.74 1, 95 0.02* P. dignus �0.13 � 0.10 0.02 1.67 1, 95 0.20 * SigniÞcant differences at P 0.05. 940 ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Vol. 103, no. 6 ing with spatial and temporal heterogeneity on host resources (Hawkins 2000). The mechanisms involved in the competence be- tween P. dignus andD. phtorimaeae are thought to be mainly via interference, although exploitation de- serves to be further explored, because P. dignus needs healthy hosts in which to oviposit (Larraṍn 1986, Luna et al., 2007, Sánchez et al. 2009). According to Mills (2006), despite theoretical predictions of competitive exclusion, Þeld data indicate that multiple natural en- emy coexist on shared hosts, at least on a seasonal basis. In the current study, two effective natural enemies of T. absoluta, a key pest in South America, have been identiÞed. This research documents the potential im- portance of two native parasitoids for the develop- ment of biological control programs for T. absoluta, and demonstrates how two competing species with complementary combinations of life history traits can be compatible. This type of information is also criti- cally important if these wasps are to be considered for importation into Europe, where T. absoluta has re- cently been introduced, or elsewhere. Acknowledgments We thank tomato growers I. Abán, P. Peralta, M. del Pino, M. Maita, R. López, S. Parrillo, and M. E. Senattori for per- mission to collect material from their farms and E. Nieves and J. Rouaux (Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores CCT CONICET-UNLP) for technical assistance. We thank J. Capinera (University of Florida) for reviewing the manu- script and for his helpful suggestions. M. C. Estivariz made the illustrations. This research was supported by grants from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientṍÞcas y Técnicas (PIP 2000), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (Projects 396, 01/01/2002, and 452, 01/01/2005), and ANPCyT (IM 40- 2000). References Cited Askew,R.R., andM.R. Shaw. 1986. Parasitoid communities: their size, structure and development, pp. 225Ð264. In J. Waage and D. Greathead (eds.), Insect parasitoids. Ac- ademic, London, United Kingdom. Bale, J. S., J. C. van Lenteren, and F. Bigler. 2008. Biological control and sustainable food production. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363: 761Ð776. Bezemer,T.M., andN. J.Mills. 2001. Hostdensity responses of Mastrus ridibundus, a parasitoid of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella. Biol. Control 22: 169Ð175. Blanchard, E. E. 1939. Insectos útiles. Bol. inform. Direc. San. Veg. 2: 29Ð32. Botto, E. 1999. Control biológico de plagas hortṍcolas en ambientes protegidos. Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent. 58: 58Ð64. Briggs, C. J. 1993. Competition among parasitoid species on a stage-structured host and its effect on host suppression. Am. Nat. 141: 372Ð397. Collier, T. R., and M. S. Hunter. 2001. Lethal interference competition in the whiteßy parasitoids Eretmocerus er- emicus and Encarsia sophia. Oecologia 129: 147Ð154. Collier, T. R., M. S. Hunter, and S. E. Nelly. 2007. Het- erospeciÞc ovicide inßuences the outcome of competi- tion between two endoparasitoids, Encarsia formosa and Encarsia luteola. Ecol. Entomol. 32: 70Ð75. Colomo, M. V., D. C. Berta, and J. Chacobar. 2002. El complejo de himenópteros parasitoides que atacan a la polilla del tomate Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechi- idae) en la Argentina. Acta Zool. Lill. 46: 81Ð92. de Santis, L. 1983. Un nuevo género y dos nuevas especies de eulóÞdos neotropicales (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Rev. Per. Entomol. 26: 1Ð4. Ecole, C. C., M. Picanco, M. D. Moreira, and S.T.V. Magal- haes. 2000. Chemical components associated with resis- tance ofLycopersicon hirsutum f. typicum to Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Ann. Soc. Ento- mol. Bras. 29: 327Ð337. Fernández, S., and A. Montagne, A. 1990. Biologṍa del mi- nador del tomate Scrobipalpula absoluta (Meyrick) (Lep- idoptera: Gelechiidae). Bol. Entomol. Venez. 5: 89Ð99. Gotelli, N. J., andA.M. Ellison. 2004. A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. Haeselbarth, E. 1979. Zur Parasitierung der Puppen von Forleule (Panolis flammea [Schiff]), Kiefernspanner (Bupalus piniarius [L.]) und Heidelbeerspanner (Bo- ramia bistortata [Goeze]) in bayerischen Kiefernwäl- dern. Teil 1. Z. Ang. Entomol. 87: 186Ð202. Hawkins, B. A. 2000. Species coexistence in parasitoid com- munities: does competition matters?, pp. 198Ð214. In M. E. Hochberg and A. R. Ives (eds.), Parasitoid popu- lation biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Heads, P. A., and J. H. Lawton. 1983. Studies on the natural enemy complex of the holly leaf-miner: the effects of scale on the detection of aggregative responses and the implication for biological control. Oikos 40: 267Ð276. Infante, F., J. Mumford, and P. Baker. 2005. Life history studies of Prorops nasuta, a parasitoid of the coffee berry borer. Biocontrol 50: 259Ð270. Jervis, M. A., and N.A.C. Kidd. 1999. Parasitoid adult nutri- tional ecology: implications for biological control, pp. 131Ð151. In B. A. Hawkins and H. V. Cornell (eds.), Theoretical approaches to biological control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. Jervis, M. A., G. E. Heimpel, P. N. Ferns, J. A. Harvey, and N.A.C. Kidd. 2001. Life-history strategies in parasitoid wasps: a comparative analysis of Ôovigeny.Õ J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 442Ð458. Lane, S. D., C. M. St. Mary, and W. M. Getz. 2006. Coex- istence of attack-limited parasitoids sequentially exploit- ing the same resource and its implications for biological control. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 43: 17Ð34. Larraı́n, P. 1986. Evaluación de la mortalidad total y para- sitismo por Dineulophus phtorimaeae de Santis (Hym, Eulophidae). Agric. Técn. (Chile) 46: 227Ð228. Lewis, W. J., J. C. van Lenteren, S. C. Phatak, and J. H. Tumlinson. 1997. A total system approach to sustainable pest management. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94: 12243Ð 12248. Lill, J. T. 1998. Density-dependent parasitism of the hack- berry nipplegall maker (Homoptera: Psyllidae): a multi- ple-scale analysis. Environ. Entomol. 27: 657Ð661. Luna, M. G., N. E. Sánchez, and P. C. Pereyra. 2007. Para- sitism of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) by Pseudapanteles dignus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) un- der laboratory conditions. Environ. Entomol. 36: 887Ð893. Marris, G. C., and J. P. Edwards. 1995. The biology of the ectoparasitoid waspEulophuspennicornis(Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on host larvae of the tomato moth, Lacano- bia oleracea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 85: 507Ð513. November 2010 LUNA ET AL: BIOLOGY OF D. phtorimaeae IN TOMATO 941 Mills, N. J. 2006. InterspeciÞc competition among natural enemies and single versus multiple introductions in bio- logical control, pp. 191Ð220. In J. Brodeur and G. Boivin (eds.), Trophic and guild interactions in biological con- trol. Springer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Muniappan, R., J. Bamba, J. Cruz, and G.V.P Reddy. 2004. Biology, rearing and Þeld release on Guam of Euplectrus maternus, a parasitoid of the fruit-piercing moth, Eu- docima fullonia. Biocontrol 49: 537Ð551. Netherlands Plant Protection Service. 2009. Tuta absoluta Povolny (Gelechiidae). Tomato leaf miner in tomato pack- aging facility in The Netherlands. (http://www.minlnv.nl/ cdlpub/servlet/CDLServlet?p_Þle_id�34842). Quicke,D.L.J. 1997. Parasitic wasps. Chapman & Hall, Lon- don, United Kingdom. Rivero, A., and S. A. West. 2005. The costs and beneÞts of host feeding in parasitoids. Anim. Behav. 69: 1293Ð1301. Sánchez, N. E., P. C. Pereyra, andM. G. Luna. 2009. Spatial patterns of parasitism of the solitary parasitoid Pseudap- anteles dignus (Muesebeck) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lep- idoptera: Gelechiidae). Environ. Entomol. 38: 365Ð374. Siqueira, H.A.A., R.N.C. Guedes, and M. C. Picanco. 2000. Cartap resistance and synergism in populations of Tuta absoluta (Lep., Gelechiidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 124: 233Ð 238. Speranza, S., E. Virla, and P. Huemer. 2009. Tuta absoluta, riconoscerla per gestirla. Terra Vita 25: 44Ð47. StatSoft. 2007. Statistica, userÕs manual, version 7. Statsoft, Tulsa, OK. Strand, M. R. 2000. Development traits and life history evo- lution in parasitoids, pp. 139Ð162. InM. E. Hochberg and A. R. Ives (eds.), Parasitoid population biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Ueno, T. 1999. Multiparasitism and host feeding by solitary parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) based on the pay-off from parasitized hosts. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 92: 601Ð608. Urbaneja, A., H. Monto, and O. Molla. 2009. Suitability of the tomato borer Tuta absoluta as prey for Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis. J. Appl. Entomol. 133: 292Ð296. Vargas, H. C. 1970. Observaciones sobre la biologṍa y en- emigos naturales de la polilla del tomate,Gnorimoschema absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Idesia 1: 75Ð110. Zaviezo, T., and N. J. Mills. 1999. Aspects of the biology of Hyssopus pallidus (Hymenoptera: Eulopidae), a parasi- toid of the codling moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Environ. Entomol. 28: 748Ð754. Received 9 February 2010; accepted 29 June 2010. 942 ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Vol. 103, no. 6